image description
Sample Design: Invertebrate biomass and diversity in Columbia Basin wetlands
  • Version History: v1.0 Finalized (4/2/2020)

The details of this Sample Design, including all the parameters used to generate it, are included below. Sample designs must belong to a Study Plan.

Description

Fish inhabited wetlands versus fish free wetlands and the effects that fish have on invertebrate populations and waterfowl production has been an ongoing investigation for decades.  In North America most studies pertaining to this issue are conducted in the prairie pothole region.  This region is considered the most important duck production habitat in North America because it can account for 50% of annual production of ducks on this continent (Smith et al. 1964) and 20 of 34 species of ducks that breed in North America are present in the area (Batt et al. 1989).  Much of the importance of the prairie pothole region to breeding ducks stems from high biomass and secondary productivity of macroinvertebrates in prairie potholes (Bataille and Baldassarre 1993). The Columbia Basin Irrigation Project (CBIP) has created attractive wetland habitat for breeding ducks, and after completion of CBIP, breeding duck pairs increased significantly (Foster and Myers 1984).  In 1985, when weighted breeding population indices were around 200,000 the wasteway stratum (primarily in the Desert unit of the Wildlife Area) supported 77 breeding duck pairs/km2, which is comparable to densities in the prairie pothole region (M. Monda, WDFW, unpublished data, Giudice et al. 2000).  However, waterfowl productivity and wetland diversity within the Columbia Basin have consistently declined in recent years (Columbia Basin Wildlife Area Wetland Management Plan, WDFW, 2006).  Fish are believed to be a culprit for this decline because they depress vegetative and invertebrate communities.  Fish presence significantly alters composition and abundance of invertebrate communities (Batzer et al. 2000, Zimmer et al. 2001) and typically reduces invertebrate availability to waterfowl (Bendell and McNicol 1995, Bouffard and Hanson 1997).  Most wetlands within the CBIP are currently inhabited by fish.  However, there are a few isolated wetlands that do not include fish and others that have potential to be rehabilitated and managed as fish-free.  Our hypothesis that we tested is that relative abundance of invertebrates differs between ponds with and without fish.​

Invertebrate sampling was conducted April 2016 to June 2016, sampling was split into three rounds; each round consisted of two weeks of sampling.  Collection of invertebrates involved using Surface-associated Activity Traps (SAT) in both open and vegetated aquatic habitats and evenly distributed through study sites.  SATs are effective for characterizing wetland invertebrate communities and provide considerable improvement over conventional activity traps for measures of relative abundance (Hanson et al. 2000).  SATs performed well for this project since traps replicate the feeding zone of most duck species and especially ducklings feeding zone.   ​

Start Year

2016

End Year

2016

Study Plan

Invertebrate biomass and diversity in Columbia Basin wetlands v1.0

Data Repositories

Photos

<none>

Documents

<none>

Area of Inference

<none>

AOI Notes

<none>


Sample Sites
These are the unique sites that are participating in this sample design over the time period covered by the design.

Map of Sites

Loading...

Sampling Schedule
This section describes which sites are scheduled to be sampled in any given year, and (if applicable) the panel and stratum that the sample site belongs to.

Plan Description

<none>


End User License Agreement

All visitors to MonitoringResources.org may read content without creating a user account. To add content and participate in collaboration features, users must create an account. Account holders must provide their name and email address, which will be viewable by anyone visiting the site.

Privacy Act Statement

Authority

Relevant acts include the Organic Act, 43 U.S.C. 31 et seq., 1879; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 1934; Fish and Wildlife Act, 1956; Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 1918; Migratory Bird Conservation Act, 1900; Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 1976; Fish and Wildlife Improvement Act, 1978; Endangered Species Act, 1973; Marine Mammal Protection Act, 1972; Great Lakes Fishery Act, 1956; Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act, 1990; Water Resources Development Act, 1990; and other authorizations conveyed to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Principal Purpose

MonitoringResources.org provides a structured system to document, store, manage and share methods, protocols, sample designs, study plans and sample locations related to natural resource monitoring and research.

Routine Uses

Used to document and share the who, what, where, when and how of natural resources monitoring and research. Users who wish to provide content, edit content and use the collaboration features of the site must create an account. Account holders must provide their name and email address, which will be viewable by anyone visiting the site. MonitoringResources.org staff may use email addresses to periodically communicate development updates, bug fixes and content to participants and to assist with completion of content, if needed. The Community feature of MonitoringResources.org supports User Profiles, which allows all site visitors to view name, email and each users’ content. Name and email of participants entering information is published via application programing interfaces (API) and shared with Sitka Technology Group (vendor contracted for site development).

For all site visitors, the following information is collected:

  • The name of the domain from which you entered our website (for example, "google.com")
  • IP Address (an IP address is a number that is automatically assigned to your computer whenever you are connected to the web)
  • The type of browser and operating system used to access our website
  • The date and time you access our website
  • The pages within our website that you visit
  • If you linked to our website from another website, the address of the website
  • This website uses session cookies. They provide enhanced navigation through the website.

We use this information to measure the number of visitors to the different sections of our website and to help make our website more useful to visitors. We do not track or record information about individuals and their visits. This information is not shared with anyone beyond the support staff for this website, except when required by Law Enforcement investigation. This information is not sold for commercial marketing purposes.

Disclosure is Voluntary

If the individual does not furnish the information requested, there will be no adverse consequences. However, if you do not provide your first and last name and email address you will not be able to enter content into MonitoringResouces.org.

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C 3501 et.seq.) requires us to inform you that the information is being collected to supplement natural resource monitoring metadata, to promote publicly accessible documentation of monitoring projects, and support coordination and integration of monitoring efforts. Use of the MonitoringResources.org tools is voluntary. Use of this website is estimated to be about 1 hour per response. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Comments regarding this collection of information should be directed to: Bureau Clearance officer, U.S. Geological Survey, . OMB Control Number 1090-0011 Expires 10/31/2021.