image description
Sample Design: South Tongue Point Response to Large Woody Debris Monitoring
  • Version History: v1.0 Finalized (7/18/2024)

The details of this Sample Design, including all the parameters used to generate it, are included below. Sample designs must belong to a Study Plan.

Description

Estuarine wetlands and floodplains are often credited as a source of enhanced productivity compared with main-channel habitat because of their enriched habitat complexity. In the lower Columbia River and Estuary (LCRE), work at select locations has been completedresearch assessing the diets of juvenile Chinook salmonids and characterizing potential prey pools has, to increase understanding of the relationship between salmonid foraging ecology and habitat capacity. However, the Expert Regional Technical Group of the Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program (CEERP) has determined that little research has addressed whether large-wood retention contributes to productivity in estuaries, as has been assessed in non-tidal systems. Further outstanding questions concern differences between large wood structures such as size, complexity, decay, surface texture, tree species, and surface vegetation. Research on juvenile salmon pPrey pools most commonly sampled in the LCRE are have included wetland channels, off-channels, and mainstem areas and have targeted micro habitats within these locations (e.g. benthic habitats, water surfaceneuston, and marsh vegetation)fallout, and emergence samples, but studies to date have not addressed the role of structures such as large wood as a medium for colonization within tidal environments. To address these data gaps and inform CEERP planners and managers, the goal of this large wood estuarine experimental design specifically focuses onis to determine the roles of large wood in tidal wetland channels of the LCRE relative to habitat functions of benefit to juvenile salmon (e.g., refuge, prey production). The objectives of this research include determining the response of biological and environmental conditions in channels with large wood structures compared to channels without.  

We have developed the following hypotheses to address research goals and objectives: 

Biological Response Variables: 

  1. Salmon abundance in treatment channels will be greater as beach seining events get nearer to the LWDthan abundance in control channels. 

  2. Fish assemblages will be more abundant and diverse as beach seining events get nearer to the LWDin channels with LWD compared to channels without wood structure.  

  3. Invertebrate abundance and diversity will be higher in channels withproximity to LWD compared to channelsareas without wood structure.  

  4. Invertebrate biomass and energy densities in proximity to LWDtreatment channels will be higher than those measured in control channelsareas1. 

Environmental Response Variables: 

  1. The density of wood will have a direct, inverse relationship to water temperature. Water temperature in treatment channels will be less than water temperature in control channels. 

  2. The density of wood will have a direct, inverse relationship to water velocity. Water velocity in treatment channels will be lower than water velocity in control channels. 

Start Year

2024

End Year

2029

Study Plan

Large Wood Estuarine Experiment v1.0

Data Repositories

Photos

<none>

Documents

<none>

Area of Inference

<none>

AOI Notes

<none>


Sample Sites
These are the unique sites that are participating in this sample design over the time period covered by the design.

Map of Sites

Loading...

Sampling Schedule
This section describes which sites are scheduled to be sampled in any given year, and (if applicable) the panel and stratum that the sample site belongs to.

Plan Description

The large wood research project will occur at the newly created South Tongue Point restoration site (see Appendix 2 for an image of the site and vicinity). The research will focus on collecting data from three channel networks (Figure 1). Each network will have one treatment channel, which includes LWD structures, and one control channel (no LWD). Sampling would occur monthly during March – May to coincide with juvenile salmon outmigration. The time horizon to complete monitoring for the large wood study is anticipated to be 4-5 years starting with construction, and ideally longer to allow for food web development.    


End User License Agreement

All visitors to MonitoringResources.org may read content without creating a user account. To add content and participate in collaboration features, users must create an account. Account holders must provide their name and email address, which will be viewable by anyone visiting the site.

Privacy Act Statement

Authority

Relevant acts include the Organic Act, 43 U.S.C. 31 et seq., 1879; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 1934; Fish and Wildlife Act, 1956; Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 1918; Migratory Bird Conservation Act, 1900; Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 1976; Fish and Wildlife Improvement Act, 1978; Endangered Species Act, 1973; Marine Mammal Protection Act, 1972; Great Lakes Fishery Act, 1956; Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act, 1990; Water Resources Development Act, 1990; and other authorizations conveyed to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Principal Purpose

MonitoringResources.org provides a structured system to document, store, manage and share methods, protocols, sample designs, study plans and sample locations related to natural resource monitoring and research.

Routine Uses

Used to document and share the who, what, where, when and how of natural resources monitoring and research. Users who wish to provide content, edit content and use the collaboration features of the site must create an account. Account holders must provide their name and email address, which will be viewable by anyone visiting the site. MonitoringResources.org staff may use email addresses to periodically communicate development updates, bug fixes and content to participants and to assist with completion of content, if needed. The Community feature of MonitoringResources.org supports User Profiles, which allows all site visitors to view name, email and each users’ content. Name and email of participants entering information is published via application programing interfaces (API) and shared with Sitka Technology Group (vendor contracted for site development).

For all site visitors, the following information is collected:

  • The name of the domain from which you entered our website (for example, "google.com")
  • IP Address (an IP address is a number that is automatically assigned to your computer whenever you are connected to the web)
  • The type of browser and operating system used to access our website
  • The date and time you access our website
  • The pages within our website that you visit
  • If you linked to our website from another website, the address of the website
  • This website uses session cookies. They provide enhanced navigation through the website.

We use this information to measure the number of visitors to the different sections of our website and to help make our website more useful to visitors. We do not track or record information about individuals and their visits. This information is not shared with anyone beyond the support staff for this website, except when required by Law Enforcement investigation. This information is not sold for commercial marketing purposes.

Disclosure is Voluntary

If the individual does not furnish the information requested, there will be no adverse consequences. However, if you do not provide your first and last name and email address you will not be able to enter content into MonitoringResouces.org.

Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C 3501 et.seq.) requires us to inform you that the information is being collected to supplement natural resource monitoring metadata, to promote publicly accessible documentation of monitoring projects, and support coordination and integration of monitoring efforts. Use of the MonitoringResources.org tools is voluntary. Use of this website is estimated to be about 1 hour per response. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Comments regarding this collection of information should be directed to: Bureau Clearance officer, U.S. Geological Survey, . OMB Control Number 1090-0011 Expires 10/31/2021.